Alzheimer Strategy
On September 10, 1999, the government of Ontario announced Ontario?s Strategy for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). The first comprehensive Alzheimer Strategy in Canada, the government committed to investing $68.4 million over five years (1999-2004). The Strategy outlines 10 specific, but related initiatives to improve the quality of life for Ontarions affected by ADRD. The resources, new positions and educational opportunities arising from these initiatives continue to have impact on caregiving....read more: Ontario?s Strategy For ADRD, Preparing For Our Future
- Alzheimer Strategy Final Evaluation Report 2005
- Evaluation Reports:
- Staff Training and Education
- Physician Training
- Increase in Public Awareness, Information and Education
- Planning Appropriate, Safe and Secure Environments
- Respite Services for Caregivers
- Research on Caregiver Needs
- Advanced Directives on Care Choices
- Psychogeriatric Consulting Resources
- Coordinated Specialized Diagnosis and Support
- Intergenerational Volunteer Initiative
- Implementation Status Milestones '04
- Overview of the Alzheimer Strategy Initiatives and Initiative Goals
Overview of the Alzheimer Strategy Initiatives and Initiative Goals
Initiative |
Main Goal(s) * |
#1: Staff Education & Training |
|
#2: Physician Training |
|
#3: Increase in Public Awareness, Information and Education |
|
#4: Planning for Appropriate, Safe and Secure Environments |
|
#5: Respite Services for Caregivers |
|
#6: Research on Caregiver Needs |
|
#7: Advance Directives on Care Choices |
|
#8: Psychogeriatric Consulting Resources |
|
#9A: Dementia Networks |
|
#9B: Research Coalition |
|
#9C: Specialized Geriatric Services |
|
#10: Intergenerational Volunteer Initiative |
|
* Taken from Ontario?s Strategy for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias 1999 ? 2004 Implementation Milestones and Status, April 2004 document.
Alzheimer Strategy ? Overall Evaluation
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Interviews with key stakeholder associations / organizations ? Phase I & II The interviews focused on the impact of the Alzheimer Strategy, strengths, weaknesses, etc. |
Stakeholder Interviews Interim Report '03 Stakeholder Interviews Final Report '04 |
Initiative 1: Staff Education and Training
Component |
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Putting the P.I.E.C.E.S. Together Learning Initiative |
Pre, immediate post and post questionnaires (confidence questions, feedback on sessions, how knowledge will be used) Survey of LTC homes (feedback on the P.I.E.C.E.S. Initiative and the PRC Role) Interviews with LTC homes that had success and limited success with P.I.E.C.E.S.
|
Init 1 - ?Putting the P.I.E.C.E.S. Together? Training Initiative 2001 Final Evaluation Report Init 1 - ?Putting the P.I.E.C.E.S. Together? Training Initiative 2002, Final Evaluation Report * Init 1 - Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities: Feedback on the P.I.E.C.E.S. Initiative Init 1 - Survey of LTC Facilities: Feedback on the PRC Role |
Enhancing Care in Adult Day Programs |
Pre and post questionnaires re: ECP Focus groups with ADP staff and clients/family members |
Init 1 - Implementing the Enhancing Care Program in ADPs: Final Evaluation Report |
U-First! Program |
Pre, immediate post and follow-up questionnaires (confidence questions, feedback on sessions, how knowledge will be used) |
Init 1 - Evaluation of the U-First! Program: Final Report |
Enabler Program |
Pre, immediate post and follow-up questionnaires (confidence questions, feedback on sessions, how knowledge will be used) |
Init 1 - Evaluation of the Enabler Program: Final Report |
Community P.I.E.C.E.S. |
Pre, immediate post and follow-up questionnaires (confidence questions, feedback on sessions, how knowledge will be used) |
Init 1 - Evaluation of the Community P.I.E.C.E.S. Program: Final Report |
Reimbursement for Education |
Feedback obtained after completion of course re: how knowledge will be used |
Init 1 - Reimbursement for Education Activities: Final Evaluation Report |
* Evaluation conducted by aestima Research, not the Alzheimer Strategy Evaluator.
Initiative 2: Physician Training
Component |
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Opinion Leader Program |
Pre questionnaire and 3 follow-up questionnaires (knowledge, dementia practices, mentoring relationship, opinion leader activities) Questionnaires to obtain feedback on workshops Opinion Leader and mentor logs Survey of physicians who were identified as being influenced by Opinion Leaders |
Init 2 Final Evaluation Report 2006
|
Peer Presenter Program |
Questionnaires to obtain feedback on workshop Peer Presenter didactic sessions ? questionnaire to obtain feedback on session Peer Presenter interactive sessions ? pre, immediate post and follow-up questionnaires (understanding of topic area, feedback on session, how knowledge used) |
|
Family Medicine Preceptor Program |
Questionnaires to obtain feedback on workshops |
|
ACP Initiative |
Pre, immediate post and follow-up questionnaires (familiarity with ACP issues, confidence questions, feedback on sessions) |
|
Curriculum |
Summary of activities undertaken by the Curriculum Advisory Committee |
Initiative 3: Increase in Public Awareness, Information and Education
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Collection of units of service data |
Init 3 Final Evaluation Report ? Overview of Results
|
Survey of PECs; survey of PECs and Alzheimer Chapter Executive Directors Questionnaire to obtain feedback on educational activities |
Initiative 4: Planning for Appropriate, Safe and Secure Environments
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Focus group with selected conference participants |
Init 4 ? Summary of Focus Group Results |
Initiative 5: Respite Services for Caregiver
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Survey of Adult Day Programs that received funding |
Init 5 ? Final Evaluation Report |
Initiative 6: Research on Caregiver Needs
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Research undertaken on caregiver needs (literature review, survey, focus groups) |
Init 6 - Research Reports Links * |
Review of scope of activities undertaken |
Init 6 ? Final Evaluation Report |
* Reports prepared by Dr. Bryan Smale and Dr. Sherry Dupuis
Initiative 7: Advance Directives on Care Choices
Component |
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Physician Opinion Leader Conferences |
Feedback on sessions |
Init 7 - Final Report on the Ian Anderson Sessions |
ACP Resource Teams & Activities |
Pre and post questionnaires for Resource Team members Pre, immediate post and follow-up questionnaires for public education session participants Pre and immediate post questionnaires for service provider education session participants |
Init 7 ? ACP Resource Teams Final Evaluation Report Init 7 ? ACP Sessions for Members of the Public Final Evaluation Report Init 7 ? ACP Sessions for Service Providers Final Evaluation Report |
LTC Administrators |
Pre and immediate post questionnaires |
Init 7 - ACP Sessions for LTC Home Administrators Final Evaluation Report |
Initiative 8: Psychogeriatric Consulting Resources
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Collection of units of service data |
Init 8 Final Evaluation Report ? Overview of Results
|
Survey of LTC homes (feedback on the P.I.E.C.E.S. Initiative and the PRC Role) |
|
Telephone interviews to obtain feedback on case-based activities |
|
Questionnaire to obtain feedback on topic-specific educational activities |
|
Questionnaires to obtain feedback from PRCs, PRC sponsoring/partner agencies, and Geriatric Mental Health Outreach Teams |
Initiative 9A: Dementia Networks
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Questionnaire to obtain feedback on regional sessions conducted about Dementia Networks |
Init 9A ? Summary of Feedback on Regional Sessions |
Interviews and questionnaires to obtain feedback on Dementia Networks |
Init 9A ? Evaluation Report Phase 1 ? 2003 Init 9A ? Evaluation Report Phase 2 ? 2005 |
Initiative 9B: Research Coalition
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Compilation of information on Research Coalition members Summary of activities undertaken by Research Coalition |
Init 9B ? Research Coalition Final Evaluation Report |
Initiative 9C: Specialized Geriatric Services
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Summary of recommendations by expert panel
|
Init 9C - Final Report prepared by the Initiative Consultants * |
* Report prepared by the Initiative #9C Consultants, not the Alzheimer Strategy Evaluator
Initiative 10: Intergenerational Volunteer Initiative
Methodology Employed |
Evaluation Report(s) |
Summary of activities undertaken and the evaluation of these activities |
Init10 ? Final report conducted by the Initiative Consultant * Init10 -Booklet: Creating a Local Intergenerational Alzheimer Projec t** |
Comment on Consultant?s report |
Init10 ? Final Report by Alzheimer Strategy Evaluator |
* Evaluation conducted by the Initiative Consultant, not the Alzheimer Strategy Evaluator.
** Booklet developed by the Older Adults Centres Association of Ontario, United Generations of Ontario, and the Alzheimer Society of Ontario.